“The important thing is not to stop questioning.”
— Albert Einstein
“The important thing is not to stop questioning.”
— Albert Einstein
As assigned, I bravely experimented with a couple of different themes today – managed four previews – and did decide to change from Truly Minimal to Skeptical. Skeptical was the first theme that I was attracted to when I first set up the blog, but wasn’t ready for some of the customizing – so I went with the very minimalist approach. Now I’ve broadened my horizons a bit (yeah, still very minimal, but that’s me) & hopefully you’ll like the new theme as well.
There are still one or 2 things I don’t like much – for example: I can’t update the ‘comments’ to ‘thoughts’ on this theme, but my intent hasn’t changed – still want you to feel free to share your thoughts on any post, or on the blog itself. Including on formatting.
I’m very behind on my Blogging 101 assignments, so I’ve decided to use the weekend (& maybe this week’s scheduled post) to play catch-up.
I liked the sound of this assignment, and yet, I find myself a bit lost – do I want to try to write a brilliant post to reach out to my dream reader? Do I want to devote a post describing my dream reader? Do I even have a dream reader?
Well, no – I don’t have dream reader defined, and therein lies my lack of focus. So perhaps this post needs to be a description.
My dream reader, I assume, would need to ‘get’ me – my sense of humor is a bit dry & my daughter thinks I use too many asides. This is likely because one thought always leads to another – and it should. So, then, my dream reader is probably me – with my family a close second. Because they are used to me. But I’d like to think that I can engage others as well. I certainly hope that I can – it’s why I’m here.
My primary goal is to share my thoughts, and have others share theirs, on things that I feel the urge to write about. I’ve been told, more than once, that not everyone thinks the same way that I do – not what I think but how. That’s probably true for most of us – we are all different people, and are wired differently. But, then, is my dream reader someone who thinks the same way I do, even if their conclusions are different? Or is it anyone who is willing to take the time to think a topic through, and yes, research a bit if the topic warrants it, so that a dialogue can be opened? Or is it really everyone – because after all, we all have something to say about most subjects. And I genuinely do want to understand the whys & hows when we don’t agree.
My first ever blog post – not quite 3 weeks ago – may have inadvertently described my dream reader by laying the groundwork for my future posts. I have no interest in ‘political correctness’, but I also have no real tolerance for the hostility & hyperbole that seems to be so common in these devisive days – so I guess, then, that my dream reader is someone who enjoys the posts, even when they don’t agree with them, and is willing to return, because there will probably be things that we do agree on. And who is willing to share their own thoughts logically, without personal attacks, or overblown rhetoric.
And in that spirit, I share again ‘The 10 Commandments of Logic’
Ahh – such a really good question, and one that I only had a weak grasp of when I set out to write a blog. In the spirit of information sharing, and in order to complete a Blogging 101 assignment, I shall try to pin it down.
I love to write as a hobby, mostly fiction, but all writing is a joy. I see a blog as way to hone my writing skills, and to, hopefully expose, more people to my writing. More exposure means that I can receive feedback from more varied sources.
I also have, sometimes strong, opinions on many different subjects, and it’s certainly more than Facebook, or ‘Letters to the Editior’ can, or should, contend with. I was also cursed with an analytic mind that looks at things from different viewpoints, and sometimes I need more input to fully form my opinion. It’s my hope that a blog will give me the ability to share those convictions, points of uncertainty, and other bits and pieces running around in my head, with others. And that they will feel comfortable sharing their own views with me. We can only grow by taking ourselves out of our bubbles and honestly listening to what others are saying. No, I won’t always change my mind when I look at things from another angle, but sometimes I do, if new information is available, or if the argument is compelling enough.
Some posts may be more journal-like, or may just be quotes or memes that appealed to me that day, that I felt were thought provoking, or otherwise worth sharing.
My goal is to interest you enough of the time that you’ll feel comfortable sharing your own thoughts on the posts, and that it will be engaging enough to keep you coming back to read more.
A recent Facebook discussion led me to ponder both the evolution of the Pledge of Allegiance, and my unease with the entire notion of reciting it. My discussion-spurring comment was posted in response to an article about the often contentious ‘under God’ addition that was made in 1954, but it was that I did not recite the Pledge at all (& have not since I was a teenager). My concern lies not with the Cold War fueled need to separate ourselves from the ‘Godless Communists’, but rather with the entire notion of declaring fealty to the flag – and the nationalism that implies.
First a very brief historical note – the Pledge was written in 1892, and was not formally adopted by Congress until 1942. It was revised in 1954 to add ‘under God’. So it has not really been a long-standing tradition, even though most of us grew up with it.
The constitution has always been a passion of mine, and I still sometimes regret the choice I made to not pursue a career in law. Partially because of that focus, I don’t always look at things in ‘expected’ ways. As an example – I debated for legalized abortion in a Catholic school a couple of years before Roe v Wade was decided – and I won the debate. I think the nuns doing the scoring were traumatized.
Like all baby boomers, I grew up during the Cold War, surrounded by constant reminders of WWII, and of Japan’s long history of Nationalist Imperialism, along with images of Nazi Germany’s SS. And of the Hammer & Sickle and the Soviet expansion. My parents were both extremely conservative (conservative enough that my mother was given John Birch Society literature by a co-worker who thought that she would find it enlightening), but interestingly enough, neither of them were ‘flag wavers’. They merely thought that the flag burners were being incredibly disrespectful, and that maybe the First Amendment was carried too far sometimes.
By the time I was in my mid-teens, I was trying to reconcile Catholicism, constitutional law, and the compacts that need to exist to keep us together as a stable society. I was also trying to understand the more extreme ‘my country – love it or leave it’ attitudes that so many of my friends’ parents, and the politicians that my parents supported, seemed to have. It was during this period that my unease about the Pledge took root.
The first concerns that I really paid attention to came from friends that were either Jehovah’s Witnesses or identified as Fundamentalist Christian. They felt that being compelled to recite the Pledge was a violation of their religious freedoms because it caused them to break the First Commandment by putting Country ahead of God. But somewhere around that time, I also began to realize that compelling anyone to recite the Pledge of Allegiance, particularly schoolchildren, was not very far removed at all from the Nationalist fervor of the Nazis, or of the ‘Godless Communist’ indoctrination that we wanted so badly to separate ourselves from. I love my country, I don’t think anywhere else is a better place to be, and I support our active military & our veterans, but I don’t recite the Pledge when I am in a situation where it is recited. I do stand at attention out of respect for our country, and for my fellow citizens, though.
Rather than the anticipated knee-jerk ‘you are even more far gone than I thought’ responses, I’m hoping that I can spur some genuine reflection. And a serious discussion of what the Pledge really means to you. Because, admit it, as kids we gave it no thought, and as adults we are seldom in a situation where it’s recited & when it is, we recite the words from memory and sit back down, without giving it another thought. And if you display the flag – are you following the flag code in how to display it? It seems to me that in the post-9/11 world we inhabit, many people display the flag in inappropriate ways – and yet I’m sure that they would find my views on the Pledge to be highly disrespectful, if not treasonous. And, for my more religious family and friends, if you do feel that pledging allegiance to the flag is meaningful & important, how does it fit in with your understanding of the First Commandment?
Okay, so I’d set a date to start my blog, and not surprisingly to anyone that knows me, I’ve come up empty (sort of). But not wanting to break a commitment to myself, please bear with me as a lay some groundwork.
As I begin my journey into the vast unknown of the blogoshere, on a day with with no deep insights to share, it occurred to me that some focus was in order. And perhaps a reminder to myself to not get caught up in frenzied hyperbole that seems to dominate so much everywhere these days. I want to share my ideas and opinions – not bludgeon anyone with them. And I’d like anyone reading to share theirs, but without the insults and hostility that pervades much of the internet these days.
My commitment to myself, and to my readers, is to keep the rules contained in the meme below always in mind. I’m human, and I will almost certainly slip occasionally, and when I do accept my advance apologies & please call me out on it. My hope is that anyone reading these posts will do the same.